Please see below. The list serv bounced the original email.
C.
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 20:53, Carina Girvan <girvanc(a)tcd.ie> wrote:
> Dear all
>
> Many thanks for the feedback and comments on the evaluation instruments
> for WP5/School Interventions. They have now been revised in light of your
> comments and also following piloting of the surveys and feedback from 5
> students in the 12-17 age range from the UK and Ireland.
>
> If you haven't yet, please share the documentation with those members of
> your teams who will be collecting data. The final documents can now be
> found in THIS
> <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1N_0fw_mTVYIliQqYDfwhhNKJHdTpTEai?us…>
> folder.
>
> Next steps include preparation of online survey tools, checklists, data
> processing plans and data analysis plans. These will be added to the folder
> as they are developed.
>
> Also many thanks to those who were able to attend today's meeting. There
> were some very interesting and practical questions raised. I've attached
> minutes from the meeting for reference (thank you to Feiran for sharing her
> notes). There were issues that cross-over with WP3 and WP4 which both
> highlight some project risks but also the need for keeping the research
> open and exploratory at this stage. It will be very valuable to have an
> extended session in Athens to discuss the practicalities, but in the
> meantime, if colleagues have questions, please drop me an email and we can
> arrange a call if helpful.
>
>
>
>
>
Dear All,
Attached please find the Exten(DT)2 newsletter that Thea and I worked on. Could you please go through it and suggest if any changes required? We will produce a final version after your suggestions and upload it on the Exten(DT)2 site. Thanks!
With warm regards,
Dr. Sagun Shrestha
Research Associate
Institute of Educational Technology (iet)
The Open University,
Walton Hall, Kents Hill, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA
[ZAA==]
Some publications:
Preparations for and practices of online education during the Covid-19 pandemic: A study of Bangladesh and Nepal, Education and information technologies, Volume 27 (Co-authored)<https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-021-10659-0>
Emergency Response in Educational Policies during COVID-19 in Nepal: A Critical Review. IAFOR Journal of Education, Volume 9, Issue 2 (Co-authored)<https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-education/volume-9-issue-2/artic…>
Mixed-Methods Research: A Discussion on its Types, Challenges, and Criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, Volume 2, Issue 2 (Co-authored)<https://jpse.gta.org.uk/index.php/home/article/view/20>
Using Machinima as Teaching and Learning Materials: A Nepalese Case Study, International Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT): Volume 9, Issue 2 (Co-authored)<https://www.igi-global.com/article/using-machinima-as-teaching-and-learning…>
How coronavirus has changed third-level education<https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2020/0324/1126056-third-level-college-univers…> (RTE Brainstorm, published on 24 March, 2020)
Dear all
Following on from the WP7 meeting last week, I have developed a series of
data collection instruments and protocols for the school interventions,
which are stored in a folder
<https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YzuyDATghL1RnkyQxPchAWeU6WTVu1QP?us…>in
WP7. This includes all the information you should need to apply for ethical
approval, such as sample informed consent/assent documents, overarching
evaluation protocol (data preparation and analysis to come), surveys,
interviews, teacher reflective diary and documents detailing the protocol
for each form of data collection.
All partners involved in interventions this year should review the
documents, add comments and make suggested edits *by 6th March. *I am also
happy to receive any direct email queries.
Please complete this Doodle
<https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/dLZkGMra>by *1st March *to
arrange a review meeting to further discuss data collection. Please ensure
at least one member of your team, involved in the interventions,
professional development or co-design workshops completes the Doodle.
Unfortunately due to other responsibilities I am unable to arrange a
meeting prior to the 7th March and the 10th is the OMT.
Any partner waiting to apply for ethical review can use all of the
documents in their current state as amendments will only be minor - aka no
new data collection instruments and no new lines of questioning. If you
have any specific questions about ethics I would be happy to help, so
please get in touch directly.
Hope you have a lovely weekend.
All the best,
Carina
Dear All
1. Please let me have by the end of this Monday (6 March) any agenda items, with indication of time required, that you would like for next Friday’s OMT meeting (10 March).
2. Please also check before the end of this Monday (6 March) the Athens meeting draft agenda here<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1a64_8InSBsQoNX-sJWfMCGJE06ODCaFbR5yljwL…> (thanks to Marianthi for putting this together):
1. For any additional input currently required from you, and/or
2. Use the suggest/comment tool to add any further items into the agenda.
Note: We aim to finalise this asap after next Friday’s OMT meeting.
3. Here is also the attendees list<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DIuZRXWrSYAvV2WNSVGoyXqW8GqxI5gfZcq…> for Athens. Check that everyone who is attending from your institute is listed.
Wishing everyone a good w/e!
Shamim
Dear All,
I am Sagun Shrestha, and I have joined as a research associate at the Institute of Educational Technology, the Open University, UK since Feb 01 to work on Extend(DT)2 project. At this point, we are working on our project website<https://extendt2.eu/> to make it resourceful and look better in presentation. As regards the ‘Team page’, <https://extendt2.eu/the-team/> the website now has PIs names. Could you please share the information (name and position) of who the members of each team in each institution are to be added to the ‘Team’ page on our website?
I am looking forward to receiving the details. Thanks!
With best regards,
Dr. Sagun Shrestha
Research Associate
Institute of Educational Technology (iet)
The Open University,
Walton Hall, Kents Hill, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA
[ZAA==]
Some publications:
Preparations for and practices of online education during the Covid-19 pandemic: A study of Bangladesh and Nepal, Education and information technologies, Volume 27 (Co-authored)<https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-021-10659-0>
Emergency Response in Educational Policies during COVID-19 in Nepal: A Critical Review. IAFOR Journal of Education, Volume 9, Issue 2 (Co-authored)<https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-education/volume-9-issue-2/artic…>
Mixed-Methods Research: A Discussion on its Types, Challenges, and Criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, Volume 2, Issue 2 (Co-authored)<https://jpse.gta.org.uk/index.php/home/article/view/20>
Using Machinima as Teaching and Learning Materials: A Nepalese Case Study, International Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT): Volume 9, Issue 2 (Co-authored)<https://www.igi-global.com/article/using-machinima-as-teaching-and-learning…>
How coronavirus has changed third-level education<https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2020/0324/1126056-third-level-college-univers…> (RTE Brainstorm, published on 24 March, 2020)
Dear All
Marcelo and I had a meeting with Angel, our PO, this afternoon and checked with him your queries on deliverables:
1. It is OK to shift D1.2 Initial Data Management Plan from M6 to M8.
1. When does a deliverable become public?:
* A deliverable will only become publicly available on EU websites when formally approved by the PO.
* Some POs formally approve the deliverables themselves, others prefer to leave the formal approval until the reviewers at the periodic reporting stage have reviewed them too.
* Any EU partner can log in and check on the portal to see the status of their deliverable, including whether it has been approved:
<Log in>Click on <ExtenD.T.2 Project: Actions><Manage Projects><Continuous Reporting><Deliverables>
* There are no fixed rules on when we ourselves can disseminate/publish our public deliverables e.g., on our extendt2 website after they have been submitted.
* Angel does not see an issue if we decide ourselves whenever to do this.
* However, Angel asked that we inform him, if we would like any deliverables to be formally approved by him on the portal, to alleviate any doubt.
* He will usually, unless he is absent, review (and approve (or not)) our deliverables usually within a day or two of request.
1. What is the procedure if a deliverable is submitted/uploaded on time and then we wish to replace it in the next week or two with a higher quality version or a small adjustment to a table etc.
* Angle was not sure. We MAY be able to resubmit IF he has not approved or rejected the deliverable.
* However, he prefers that he be contacted, as he does see an issue of us replacing a deliverable in such circumstances. He can reject the deliverable from his side then and allow us to resubmit/upload a new version without issue.
Best regards to you all for the w/e!
Shamim
Dear all,
As we discussed in previous meetings, we have created a one-page document
that summarizes the functionalities and the added value of the 3 existing
authoring tools (ChoiCo, MaLT2 and SorBET). It was designed to address
mainly teachers and educators, but also other people who want to have a
first idea of the project technologies. We tried to make it more
attractive than a simple text document
Feel free to distribute it to teachers that will design and implement
interventions (WP3), teachers in professional development (WP6) or any
other interested stakeholder.
I will also upload it in the drive in WP4 folder (technologies)
Best wishes,
Marianthi
Marianthi Grizioti (PhD)
Post-doc researcher & software developer
*Educational Technology Lab (ETL) <http://etl.eds.uoa.gr/> *
*Department of Educational Studies*
*National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece*
Research Gate <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marianthi_Grizioti>
| Academia
<https://en-uoa-gr.academia.edu/MarianthiGrizioti>| LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/marianthi-grizioti-b0394038/>
Dear All
Can you check that your requested points are on the agenda AND indicate how long you would like for your agenda point if you have not already.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sFYtzQyAGN36_GcWwy7zgBS9ViMi5XTt/edit
Please also check that any of your comments that may still be valid, have not disappeared in error.
LNU and NKUA will have a meeting early tomorrow afternoon to discuss the agenda, so please do this before 12.00 CET tmrw.
Best regards
Shamim
Dear all,
Our submission was accepted as a poster (see comments at the end of this email).
@Chronis Kynigos<mailto:kynigos@eds.uoa.gr> would you be able to join the conference and present?
Best,
Thea
From: info(a)earli.org <info(a)earli.org>
Date: Monday, 20 February 2023 at 09:14
To: Christothea.Herodotou [She/Her] <christothea.herodotou(a)open.ac.uk>
Subject: Your EARLI 2023 review result
CAUTION: This mail comes from outside the University. Please consider this before opening attachments, clicking links, or acting on the content.
[https://www.earli-eapril.org/uploads/summernote/d46fe2cad3991a286ac19eb2f00…]
Please read this message carefully as it contains important information about EARLI 2023.
---
Dear Dr Herodotou,
Congratulations!
Your Single Paper "Extending Design Thinking with Digital Technologies" has been accepted for presentation at EARLI 2023 in Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece as Poster Presentation.
More details about the review process can be found at http://earli.org/events/EARLI2023. The status of your proposal can be found in your user dashboard.
Best wishes,
EARLI 2023 Organising Committee
EARLI 2023
http://earli.org/events/EARLI2023
___
score: 50.00 / comment: This proposal should be presented as a poster. It's a nice and interesting project, yet, still in the starting phase. There are no results or conclusions that can be mentioned in this stage. Therefor, the advice is to present it as a poster.
score: 80.00 / comment: The paper proposes a DBR into the possible use of emerging technologies at schools. The design is well described and the expected contributions would benefit the field.
score: 50.00 / comment: The proposal is very difficult to understand. I suspect it is not written by colleagues comming from the education world, but rather from the technical/bussiness world. Since it talks about expected findings, it should be -if at all- presented as a poster, or perhaps a workshop
total score: 60.000000
For more detailed review results, please consult your user dashboard in your account.
Best wishes,
EARLI Office
Peterseliegang 1 box 1
3000 Leuven (BELGIUM)
info(a)earli.org<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmandrilla…>
BE0806.313.092
