Could this list be an initial orphanage for projects until the frequency makes a separate
list feasible?
- Rainer
Am 2018-02-23 um 21:53 schrieb Heather Flanagan
<hlflanagan at sphericalcowgroup.com>:
On 2/23/18 12:50 PM, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
On 23 February 2018 at 19:18, Heather Flanagan
<hlflanagan at sphericalcowgroup.com> wrote:
On 2/23/18 9:10 AM, Heather Flanagan wrote:
Hi all,
At this point, we have a general discussion list for the umbrella
project that is Identity Python (idpy-discuss at lists.sunet.se). We also
have a specific dev list for Satosa (satosa-dev at lists.sunet.se). Given
we have formally accepted pyff, pysaml, and pyXMLSecurity into the idpy
project, can we create targeted dev lists for them as well? Or do those
lists already exist?
I would say that wether a project has a dedicated mailing list depends
on that project's maintainers/developers. I do not think we can force
anyone to participate into a ML. If people need help and no ML is
present, then the natural direction is to use github issues.
I'm not really thrilled with this idea. I like github for issues and
changes, but for general questions I'd rather a mailing list. I look at
how satosa-dev is used, for instance, and I think that's a sensible way
to go about it. And if we're talking about a project under the idpy
umbrella, I'd rather they all work under the same (or at least very
similar) model.
Of course, this is implying that the project is on github, which brings
me to point out that this is something we do imply but have never
clearly stated: "idpy-projects must(?) be hosted under the idpy org on
github".
Yes.
-Heather
_______________________________________________
Idpy-discuss mailing list
Idpy-discuss at lists.sunet.se <mailto:Idpy-discuss at lists.sunet.se>
https://lists.sunet.se/listinfo/idpy-discuss
<https://lists.sunet.se/listinfo/idpy-discuss>