Attendees:
Ivan, Giuseppe, Roland, Scott, Heather, JohnP
1 - Governance policy updates
• no comment on the PR; next step to send these to the Board for approval
• djangosaml2 status - need to make sure the maintainers are good with the revised governance policies
2 - GitHub review
a. OIDC - https://github.com/IdentityPython (JWTConnect-Python-OidcRP, JWTConnect-Python-CryptoJWT, etc)
Roland and team are still working on the session management system. Particular thanks to Nikos for the hours he's put into this.
Roland is looking at dpop (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-dpop/) which is a way to bind tokens to clients so a resource server can check that the token came from the client that received the token. It uses http headers and puts a signed json web token in it. The source code can't do much with http headers, so some additional functionality is required. Will there be a signature on the header? It's using Proof of Possession. The json web token has as the payload a representation fo the public key that the token was signed with.
b. Satosa - https://github.com/IdentityPython/SATOSA
Travis-ci (https://www.travis-ci.com/, a hosted service used during integration testing) is still not working properly. Ivan has reached out to the platform maintainers, but has not heard back.
Doing work in eduTEAMS, including different errors for users. Goal is to catch the errors (since we know about them) and exposing new exception types so we can handle the errors better. Will introduce a handler for the errors (a module that the admins can write to make explicit what they want to have happen with a given defined error). This will also result in better logging.
c. pySAML2 - https://github.com/IdentityPython/pysaml2
See discussions on idpy #saml slack channel.
Ivan is working on the encryption and signature parts. This is the priority for pySAML2 for now.
d. pyFF - https://github.com/IdentityPython/pyFF
3 - AOB
• Python version support - Roland received a PR from a developer of cryptJWT, and in that included deprecating Python 3.6 because there is an EOL on 3.6 coming up at the end of this year. When we know of an official EOL for any components in our project, when should we deprecate it out of our projects? Before it reaches EOL, or shortly after?
• Scott suggests we try to wait on the timeline to transition of 3.6 until 4Q 2021; some active platforms (NIAID/NIH) out there depend heavily on Centos7, and they can get python 3.6 from that associated repository. Getting python 3.7, however, is harder. They are in process to transitioning to a docker-based architecture, but it will take them several months to get there.
• Why do we need to deprecate 3.6? Are we blocked on functionality in the language? Deprecating means we're not going to test it or patch against that version. We've also talked about basing our code on what's in Debian stable, and that Debian comes with python 3.7. We should have a plan on the transition and be prepared to notify users (announcing on Slack and the mailing list).
• Next steps: we will start the communications process in September/October to let people know this is going to happen, announce in a couple of releases, then make it official
Thanks! Heather
Attendees:
Ivan, Giuseppe, Johan, John, Scott, Heather, Davide Brunato
Agenda:
0 - Agenda bash
idpy funding - how are we funded? entirely in-kind work. It's a big lift to start a fundraising project, and to find people who can write the quality of code we need are hard to find. We would need something like two FTE for a couple of years.
• Sunet will be hiring a new person, and there will be some more dedicated time from that person
1 - Governance policy updates
a. https://github.com/IdentityPython/Governance/pull/7
Added clarity to what we're expecting with regards to adding and supporting projects within idpy, as discussed on previous calls (e.g., semver, change logs, etc). Group is encouraged to review these
2 - GitHub review
a. OIDC - https://github.com/IdentityPython (JWTConnect-Python-OidcRP, JWTConnect-Python-CryptoJWT, etc)
A big merge request is coming re: session management, which will effect the whole library.
b. Satosa - https://github.com/IdentityPython/SATOSA
c. pySAML2 - https://github.com/IdentityPython/pysaml2
Hannah is working on the readthedocs for pySAML2. Expect to see a pull request soon.
Had discussions on slack on how to restructure the core of pySAML2; see thread starting 30 January 2021. Ivan suggests working on this in two phase: change how we consume XML docs, and how we produce XML docs.
• for the consuming side, changing this is fairly easy, and some of this was done with the security changes via xmlschema.
• for the producing side, the latest version of xmlschema has some ability to help us here. We also can consider xsdata that reads schema and creates classes.
• xsdata + pydantic would be a great combination of features to support the necessary validation for the objects we build.
• Ivan will post on slack example use cases for what would be most useful.
• There is some concern whether not using bindings will reduce the flexibility of the objects and the way we can work with them.
• Can xmlschema work alongside xsdata classes? We would be able to use xsdata as a converter. Uncertain; need to test.
i. https://xsdata.readthedocs.io
d. pyFF - https://github.com/IdentityPython/pyFF
3 - AOB
Thanks! Heather
Attendees:
Stephen Schwichtenberg, Ivan, Christos, John P, Heather, Johan, Scott
Regrets:
Roland
Notes:
0 - Agenda bash
1 - Security Vulnerability - review
looking for feedback on how we handled the announcements.
Ivan made a private incident-response team to review the patches, but not sure that many people tested. eduTeams did some testing after about a week and found a few issues coming from the new patches. The new code had test cases, but they can't account for everything. We need better community testing.
We made the CVEs public on Jan 20, created a new release for pySAML2, and sent out an announcement. Also updated Satosa, including a new docker image. We also have a new web page: https://idpy.org/security/.
Feedback
• We announced the new release would be available before we actually had the release. That put some time strain on things that rushed the testing and development. We underestimated the complexity, so suggest we needed to have the testing done first, before we make an announcement. There were also requests for early access; how do we answer questions like that? Who gets early access, and who doesn't? Giving a heads' up to the ops people is good, but better to have the patches ready first.
• The clients who had been keeping themselves up to date had the least issues in handling the update. The ones that are still on old versions had quite a few more challenges (custom microservices no longer worked, configs had to change, etc). Standard devops best practice makes responding to this kind of issue much easier.
• In terms of curating a list of early testers, the people who show up and contribute to the community are the ones that should get premium access.
2 - GitHub review
a. OIDC - https://github.com/IdentityPython (JWTConnect-Python-OidcRP, JWTConnect-Python-CryptoJWT, etc)
Tuesday, 26 January 2021, 14:00 UTC
BlueJeans: https://bluejeans.com/444837426?src=join_info
Regrets:
Roland
Agenda:
0 - Agenda bash
1 - Security Vulnerability - review
2 - GitHub review
a. OIDC - https://github.com/IdentityPython (JWTConnect-Python-OidcRP, JWTConnect-Python-CryptoJWT, etc)
b. Satosa - https://github.com/IdentityPython/SATOSA
c. pySAML2 - https://github.com/IdentityPython/pysaml2
d. pyFF - https://github.com/IdentityPython/pyFF
3 - Normalizing idpy projects (see email from Ivan, "Subject: [idpy-discuss] Normalizing across all projects”, 10 November 2020)
a. Extending the invitation to djangosaml2 - status?
4 - AOB
Thanks! Heather
Dear users of IdentityPython,
this is a heads-up about two vulnerabilities affecting pySAML2.
Software that uses pySAML2 is indirectly affected, too (ie, SATOSA).
The issues were reported to the IdentityPython incident-response
mailing list and we have been working on a mitigation. A new version
of pySAML2 that includes the fixes will be released on Wednesday
20th of January between 13:00 CET and 17:00 CET. We urge
everyone to be prepared to update their setup to the latest version.
Kind regards,
Ivan Kanakarakis on behalf of the incident-response team
Attendees
John, Scott, Giuseppe, Ivan, Hannah, Ori, Johan, Chris
0 - Agenda bash
1 - Administrivia
Suggestion made that announcements of security issues should include some indication of severity and whether there is indication these have been found 'in the wild'. Also some additional guidance on what to expect with regards to remediation (what are deployers expected to do, what level of effort can people expect to encounter) would be helpful. The team will put together an FAQ on how security vulnerabilities are handled and include a log of known vulnerabilities (once those vulnerabilities and their remediations are public).
2 - GitHub review
a. OIDC - https://github.com/IdentityPython (JWTConnect-Python-OidcRP, JWTConnect-Python-CryptoJWT, etc)
No update
b. Satosa - https://github.com/IdentityPython/SATOSA
c. pySAML2 - https://github.com/IdentityPython/pysaml2
Nothing major through the holiday, only some minor fixes for the tests. Ivan wants to reorganize the code a bit to clearly separate the operations that work on the XML document representation from those that work on an object representation of the XML data.
d. pyFF - https://github.com/IdentityPython/pyFF
No update
3 - Normalizing idpy projects (see email from Ivan, "Subject: [idpy-discuss] Normalizing across all projects”, 10 November 2020)
a. Extending the invitation to djangosaml2 - status?
Will add to the agenda for our next call
4 - AOB
Thanks! Heather
Tuesday, 12 January 2021, 14:00 UTC
BlueJeans: https://bluejeans.com/444837426?src=join_info
Agenda:
0 - Agenda bash
1 - Administrivia
2 - GitHub review
a. OIDC - https://github.com/IdentityPython (JWTConnect-Python-OidcRP, JWTConnect-Python-CryptoJWT, etc)
b. Satosa - https://github.com/IdentityPython/SATOSA
c. pySAML2 - https://github.com/IdentityPython/pysaml2
d. pyFF - https://github.com/IdentityPython/pyFF
3 - Normalizing idpy projects (see email from Ivan, "Subject: [idpy-discuss] Normalizing across all projects”, 10 November 2020)
a. Extending the invitation to djangosaml2 - status?
4 - AOB
Thanks! Heather
Hello all,
Thank you for filling out the doodle poll to determine when we should have our calls! We’ll be using the same time slot (14:00 UTC for now, subject to change during those pesky Daylight Saving Time changes).
If the Google Gods are being cooperative today, you should be able to add this calendar invitation via the following link:
https://calendar.google.com/event?action=TEMPLATE&tmeid=NXJmNXZ0dG9kbWNkcTd…
Our first call for 2021 will be next week on Tuesday, 12 January 2021.
Thanks! Heather
