3:12 p.m.
Dear all,
I hope you had a refreshing and relaxing holiday!
This is just a reminder for the following email, to share your thoughts
and plans on implementing a small pilot study in the first year.
In this
excel, in the "Targets-Plans" tab, you can find a table with the
numbers promised for each year for school interventions (on the left) and
a suggested plan of how they can be distributed between partners (on the
right). This is an indicative plan, based on the PMs each partner has in
WP5. It can change accordingly as long as we reach the targets
Can you please have a look at the excel and the attached email and
share your ideas/plans by this Friday the 13th? We can
also discuss this point in the OMT meeting this Friday.
@Shamim, can you add 15 minutes to the agenda for this point, so that
we don't use WPs updates time?
Best wishes for a happy new year,
Marianthi Grizioti
Dear all,
We found out that there are 2 different things mentioned in the
proposal (attached) regarding the partners who will do pilot school
interventions in Year 1
On page 11, Cycle 1 descritpion, i.e. Y1 , writes that
"The evaluation (WP7) will take an in-depth look at the implementation of
Exten.(D.T.)2 activities in two classrooms in each
country."
On page 32, WP5 Task 5.2, writes that "[...]
implementation of pilot interventions by 1-2 partners in
a school setting. It will engage a small number of students (~100
students) for the initial testing of Exten.(D.T.)2 technologies
(WP4) and resources (WP3)."
So we have to decide what we will do to reach the numbers and stick
with what we have promised
Regardless the above, it is probably a good idea that each partner does
at least one small pilot intervention for this year, e.g.
1 teacher and 8-10 students, for the following
reasons:
1) If all partners are involved in year 1 piloting they will provide
valuable feedback on the evaluation, the intervention process and the
technologies which will then be a strong baseline for designing year 2
tools and resources
2) With piloting, partners will develop the necessary experience and
background for year 2 implementations, which are full studies and with a
much higher number of students. Otherwise we may face the issue of year 2
turning to be the pilot phase for some partners instead of a full study.
3) We don't know if the reviewer and the PO will notice that so, it is
better to stick with the scenario that promises the most, i.e. all
partners do piloting, rather than the less.
Please let us know what you think on that.
A reminder: In this excel you can see the planned school
interventions and insert your infromation
Best regards,
Marianthi
--
Marianthi
Grizioti (PhD)
Post-doc researcher & software
developer
Educational Technology Lab
(ETL)
Department of
Educational Studies
National and
Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
Research Gate | Academia | LinkedIn
Χωρίς
ιούς.www.avast.com
--
Marianthi Grizioti (PhD)
Post-doc researcher &
software developer
Educational Technology Lab (ETL)
Department of
Educational Studies
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens,
Greece