8:51 p.m.
On 2/9/18 2:07 AM, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
+1 I also agree that is a good idea.
If we have a stable call for idpy then we could devote a small part of
it, like 5 or 10 minutes to propose which PR(s) should be discussed
and have priority list. Any PR needs some time to be checked and
understood and that is difficult to do on a call. So, having a list of
PRs sorted by priority will help us do some work before the
discussion.
I think we should try it and see how it goes.
Do you think you can send me a list of how you see the priority for
Satosa requests? I'll talk with Leif about pyff.
-Heather
On 8 February 2018 at 15:06, Roland Hedberg <roland
at catalogix.se> wrote:
Yes. I expect we'll deal with Satosa and pyff; we'll need a longer
conversation about how to handle pySAML requests.
> On 8 Feb 2018, at 13:21, Heather Flanagan <hlflanagan at sphericalcowgroup.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to set up regular calls for folks to discuss open pull
> requests. I'm thinking an hour every other week, with a maximum of 30
Just
a note, the PRs are not only pending on SATOSA but other projects too. minutes
on any single pull request. There will have to be a certain
amount of scheduling magic to make sure the submitter is on the call to
discuss, but that'll be my problem to coordinate.
Any objections? Or would folks prefer this to be weekly, at least until
we get through the existing backlog of requests?
I think that would be a good
idea.