Hi Marianthi, Sofia, and All,
Thank you, at LNU, we believe the most practical and appropriate approach is as follows:
Each partner should respond directly to Marianthi, confirming whether or not it is
acceptable to include their respective teachers' Activity Plans (APs) in the
appendices, or advise of any further action required. This allows each partner to consult
further with their teachers if needed.
To summarize:
- NKUA: 8 APs to confirm
- Katrien/UGent: 4 APs to confirm
- Sagun (in Thea’s absence): 2 APs to confirm
- Sofia/NTNU: 3 APs to confirm
- LNU/Marcelo: 1 AP to confirm
- TCD/Jake: 1 AP to confirm
The attached appendices should remain confidential for now.
I have removed the link in the D5.3 just shared with all our consortium
However, they were submitted to the EC Portal on Thursday, April 29, I have written to our
PO to request that they be kept confidential temporarily. I have also informed him that we
may need to make adjustments to the appendices and replace the link in the main
deliverable.
This should not pose any issues.
We do need to address this as soon as possible though, and we should be ready to update
him by the end of September if any changes are required.
Best regards,
Shamim
From: Sofia Papavlasopoulou <spapav(a)ntnu.no>
Date: Friday, 30 August 2024 at 18:46
To: Marianthi Grizioti <mgriziot(a)eds.uoa.gr>, "Exten.D.T.2_OMT_Mailing
List" <extendt2_omt(a)lists.sunet.se>
Subject: [Extendt2_omt] Re: Reg. usage of Activity Plans in Del
Hi Marianthi,
Thank you for following up on this.
It depends on a few factors, for example in what each teacher gave consent, what they want
(e.g. maybe they want their name to be written or not, or anything else), who wrote the
activity plan (for example in some are only the researchers), how it is the process in
each country etc....
So, it should be checked for the shared activity plans if and how they can appear
publicly.
For NTNU, for two of the activity plans it should be fine (I will confirm as soon as
possible), but in the third one, the names and a source (since it is used also by master
students) should be added (I will give information).
Best,
Sofia
.ps I downloaded the deliverable from the shared folder and the links are not
"clickable" except from the project's one, but maybe I do something wrong
________________________________
From: mgriziot(a)eds.uoa.gr <mgriziot(a)eds.uoa.gr> on behalf of Marianthi Grizioti
<mgriziot(a)eds.uoa.gr>
Sent: 30 August 2024 17:09
To: Exten.D.T.2_OMT_Mailing List <extendt2_omt(a)lists.sunet.se>
Subject: [Extendt2_omt] Reg. usage of Activity Plans in Del
Dear all,
I don't know if this can cover us regarding the usage of teachers' Activity Plans
in public reports, but in the consent forms writes that the collected data from the
teacher includes
"Lesson activity plans and any supporting materials"
and then in the data usage section says that
"De-identified data may be used in reports, presentations and other research outputs,
in which a randomly assigned pseudonym will be used."
So maybe we are ok? I don't know, what do you think?
Best,
Marianthi
Marianthi Grizioti (PhD)
Post-doc researcher & software developer
Educational Technology Lab (ETL)<http://etl.eds.uoa.gr/>
Department of Educational Studies
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
Research
Gate<https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marianthi_Grizioti> | Academia
<https://en-uoa-gr.academia.edu/MarianthiGrizioti> |
LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/marianthi-grizioti-b0394038/>