[Idpy-discuss] CMService -> SimpleConsent

I drafted a new consent service based on Django: https://github.com/identinetics/simpleconsent/blob/master/README.adoc [1] I weighted the complexity of CMservice, its lack of documentation and community support vs being an already deployed project. I think that I will drop CMservice and go ahead with developing simpleconsent in second half of September, unless someone would propose an alternative. Any encouragement or dissuation? A consideration is that Django does not work with SQLAlchemy, which is a different type of ORM. But I would need to stick to Django for development speed.

- Rainer [1] @Heather: Is there an RFC that dismisses the use of „simple“ in project names? My excuse is, that SCAR (Simple Consent for Attribute Release) did not sound well, either. Am 2019-08-15 um 20:16 schrieb Rainer Hoerbe <rainer at hoerbe.at>: Thanks for the quick answer. I hope that we can cover this in the idpy call next week, as I will be on vacation fro 2weeks afterwards. I would be interested in your assessment of the code. On my side, I am unhappy that the APi is undocumented and has to be reverse engineered from the view definitions etc. - Rainer Am 2019-08-15 um 20:06 schrieb Christos Kanellopoulos < christos.kanellopoulos at geant.org>: Hi Rainer We have done some further work on the CM service and we have fixed various bugs. Now not myself and Ivan are on holidays. Next week we will not be back and share the updated code. Having said this, we are seriously thinking to abandon this code base and develop a cm l component from scratch. Christos ------------------------------ *From:* Rainer Hoerbe <rainer at hoerbe.at> *Sent:* Thursday, August 15, 2019 8:22:13 PM *To:* Christos Kanellopoulos <christos.kanellopoulos at geant.org> *Subject:* Re: CMservice gitlab export Hi Christos, The integration of CMservice into SATOSA is again on the top of my todo list. When I added your tar-ball from 22. May, I notices that the unit tests have not been updated to reflect the changes in src. I fixed this in https://github.com/its-dirg/CMservice/pull/11, and a few dependency issuers. Is there any new status on the GÉANt branch of the project? Any new commits? I would like to know if there is a chance to consolidate efforts wrt this project. do you know, or do you know someone who might know? Cheers, Rainer Am 2019-05-22 um 12:02 schrieb Christos Kanellopoulos < christos.kanellopoulos at geant.org>: Hello Rainer, find it attached. Yesterday afternoon, became really late night. Christos On 22 May 2019, at 11:54, Rainer Hoerbe wrote: May I send a friendly reminder? thanks! Am 2019-05-21 um 08:47 schrieb Christos Kanellopoulos < christos.kanellopoulos at geant.org>: Hello Rainer I am at the hospital, but I will be able to send it to you later this afternoon Christos ------------------------------ *From:* Rainer Hoerbe <rainer at hoerbe.at> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 21, 2019 9:46 AM *To:* Christos Kanellopoulos *Subject:* CMservice gitlab export Hi Christos, You mentioned in the last idpy meeting that I might get a copy of Geant’s CMService repo on gitlab. Whom would I ask to get it? Thanks and best regards Rainer -- Christos Kanellopoulos Senior Trust & Identity Manager GÉANT M: +31 611 477 919 Networks • Services • People Learn more at www.geant.org​ GÉANT Vereniging (Association) is registered with the Chamber of Commerce in Amsterdam with registration number 40535155 and operates in the UK as a branch of GÉANT Vereniging. Registered office: Hoekenrode 3, 1102BR Amsterdam, The Netherlands. UK branch address: City House, 126-130 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 1PQ, UK. <cm-service-devel.tar.gz> _______________________________________________ Idpy-discuss mailing list Idpy-discuss at lists.sunet.se https://lists.sunet.se/listinfo/idpy-discuss