Dear all,
I attach the early draft of the dissemination deliverable I plan to discuss with you tomorrow - for reference and in case you want to have a look at it before the meeting.
Also, there are two opportunities for dissemination, I would like us to briefly talk about.
1. https://www.mis4tel-conference.net/organization/committee (Marcelo)
2. https://oeweek.oeglobal.org (Thea)
See you all tomorrow,
Thea
Dr Christothea Herodotou
Professor of Learning Technologies and Social Justice
Institute of Educational Technology (iet)
https://iet.open.ac.uk/people/christothea.herodotou
[signature_1394732647]
Dear All,
Thank you for your feedback and comments on the draft JCD shared with you all in November.
LNU’s DPO and lawyer have incorporated changes to the revised attached draft, dated 19122022, and added two annexes.
Their responses (in bold text) to questions can be found in attachment 4.
Please send any further feedback to the draft JCD, including your additions for Annexes 1 and 2 by Monday 9th January.
Please also check the name of the person who would sign the JCD for your organisation on pp 8-14.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Best regards,
Shamim
-------------------------------------------------
Shamim Patel (ACA)
Project Manager | Exten.(D.T.)2 Project
Linnæus University
Office of External Relations
SE-351 95 Växjö | Sweden
M: +46 (0)705 898396 | lnu.se<https://lnu.se/en/>
-------------------------------------------------
Dear all
Following on from the WP7 meeting last week, I have developed a series of
data collection instruments and protocols for the school interventions,
which are stored in a folder
<https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YzuyDATghL1RnkyQxPchAWeU6WTVu1QP?us…>in
WP7. This includes all the information you should need to apply for ethical
approval, such as sample informed consent/assent documents, overarching
evaluation protocol (data preparation and analysis to come), surveys,
interviews, teacher reflective diary and documents detailing the protocol
for each form of data collection.
All partners involved in interventions this year should review the
documents, add comments and make suggested edits *by 6th March. *I am also
happy to receive any direct email queries.
Please complete this Doodle
<https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/dLZkGMra>by *1st March *to
arrange a review meeting to further discuss data collection. Please ensure
at least one member of your team, involved in the interventions,
professional development or co-design workshops completes the Doodle.
Unfortunately due to other responsibilities I am unable to arrange a
meeting prior to the 7th March and the 10th is the OMT.
Any partner waiting to apply for ethical review can use all of the
documents in their current state as amendments will only be minor - aka no
new data collection instruments and no new lines of questioning. If you
have any specific questions about ethics I would be happy to help, so
please get in touch directly.
Hope you have a lovely weekend.
All the best,
Carina
Hi Marianthi, hi All,
Thank you for your email. This is applicable for other WP deliverables who have updated versions as well as WP5
Q Re, updated D5.1: Re, either of what you propose would be acceptable to the EC.
(e.g. for the updated DMP deliverable the text was kept from the initial DMP deliverable with additions, and for the WP8 Dissemination deliverable, a new deliverable was written at M18 rather than updating the M6 related deliverable. These deliverables have been approved.
Every WP that has updated versions of deliverables should choose what is most appropriate for them.
If you have a lot of new text, and as D5.1 (submitted in M6) was relatively long, it may be more appropriate to write a new shorter deliverable, and (i) reference to the first version in the Introduction, and (ii) where applicable in the Sections that follow.
Or, if you can put all the “new material” as appendices then it should be sufficient to write a preface to the first version and do it this way.
Re, D5.2 request:
Yes, unfortunately there are inconsistencies in the due dates of deliverables in various places in the Grant Agreement.
The EC portal (which is what the control excel sheet<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wCYFr8Fph4wFUJguQQU7oWT7QTTe8-HlbUT…> is based on) has some dates wrong as a result,
I do not see there being any problem to rectify D5.3 to from M30 to M34 for the third-year implementations with our PO (and similarly for D6.2 as Christina has pointed out). I will inform our PO of this.
@ALL: (For info)
* We have not yet received any formal feedback on the P1 deliverables from the reviewers ,but as far as I can see on the portal all deliverables have been approved.
* A general note for all deliverables in Period 2, is to try and keep them short for the reviewers (<30 pages max would seem appropriate) and include large amounts of data e.g. Activity Plans etc. as Appendices/Annexes where possible.
* We will also be reviewing deliverables in the OMT meeting on Friday and further discussions can be taken there. Please review the linked control excel sheet above before then.
Best, Shamim
From: Marianthi Grizioti <margrizioti(a)gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, 21 May 2024 at 11:18
To: "Exten.D.T.2_OMT_Mailing List" <extendt2_omt(a)lists.sunet.se>
Subject: WP5 deliverables on M24
Hi Shamim,
We have 1 question and 1 request regarding the upcoming deliverables of WP5
We have to submit an updated version of Del 5.1 (v1 submitted on M6). In the new document should we keep the text from v1 and extend it with new chapters concerning the updates or should we write a new text and refer to v1 in it?
There is one mistake in Del 5.3. It says that the first report is on M24 and the updated on M30. However in the grant agreement on the deliverables table the update of Del5.3 is on M34 (see screenshot). This makes more sense, since the 3rd year interventions will be in progress on M30. Can we modify this?
[cid:image001.png@01DAAB89.563787C0]
Best,
Marianthi
Marianthi Grizioti (PhD)
Post-doc researcher & software developer
Educational Technology Lab (ETL)<http://etl.eds.uoa.gr/>
Department of Educational Studies
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
Research Gate<https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marianthi_Grizioti> | Academia <https://en-uoa-gr.academia.edu/MarianthiGrizioti> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/marianthi-grizioti-b0394038/>
Dear All,
Attached please find the newsletter (May Issue), the final version. Please let me know if you spot any errors in it. Provided you don’t spot any, I will upload this on our site and circulate it through our social media site.
Have a wonderful weekend!
Best,
Sagun
Dear All,
Attached please find the draft newsletter (May Issue). Please, let me know if you have any comments and suggestions on it. We will release it tomorrow evening by uploading it on our site.
Best,
Sagun
Dear All
Attached you can find the draft minutes and WP updates from our OMT meeting last Friday.
Please check all Actions/To Dos that apply to you in the minutes and slides.
If you would like any additions or changes let me know by COB next Wednesday 5th June.
NB: The next OMT meeting is at 10.30-12.00 CEST on Friday 14th June.
Best regards
Shamim
-------------------------------------------------
Shamim Patel (ACA)
Project Manager | Exten.(D.T.)2 Project
Linnæus University
Office of External Relations
SE-351 95 Växjö | Sweden
M: +46 (0)705 898396 | lnu.se<https://lnu.se/en/>
-------------------------------------------------
Dear all,
We would like to give to the teachers who performed the school
interventions a certificate of participation in the ExtenDT2 project. Has
any of you done something similar so that we can use the same template? It
would be nice if all partners used the same template for this certificate.
Note that this is different from the credentials we will be giving to those
who enrolled and completed the PD courses in NKUA and UGent (for that we
will probably use Europass Digital Credential (EDCI)).
Best,
Marianthi
Marianthi Grizioti (PhD)
Post-doc researcher & software developer
*Educational Technology Lab (ETL) <http://etl.eds.uoa.gr/> *
*Department of Educational Studies*
*National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece*
Research Gate <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marianthi_Grizioti>
| Academia
<https://en-uoa-gr.academia.edu/MarianthiGrizioti>| LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/marianthi-grizioti-b0394038/>
Hi Shamim,
We have 1 question and 1 request regarding the upcoming deliverables of WP5
We have to submit an updated version of Del 5.1 (v1 submitted on M6). In
the new document should we keep the text from v1 and extend it with new
chapters concerning the updates or should we write a new text and refer to
v1 in it?
There is one mistake in Del 5.3. It says that the first report is on M24
and the updated on M30. However in the grant agreement on the deliverables
table the update of Del5.3 is on M34 (see screenshot). This makes more
sense, since the 3rd year interventions will be in progress on M30. Can we
modify this?
[image: Screenshot 2024-05-21 121734.png]
Best,
Marianthi
Marianthi Grizioti (PhD)
Post-doc researcher & software developer
*Educational Technology Lab (ETL) <http://etl.eds.uoa.gr/> *
*Department of Educational Studies*
*National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece*
Research Gate <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marianthi_Grizioti>
| Academia
<https://en-uoa-gr.academia.edu/MarianthiGrizioti>| LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/marianthi-grizioti-b0394038/>
