12:56 p.m.
Hello Roland,
Of course, we do not have to use the eduTEAMS implementation. Having said this, once again
we are hindered by the the changes in the underlying libraries. In September the
development team has migrated the frontend to the new OP library, but our testing has
showing that the new implementation is not stable for production use. At this point we are
not sure whether it is a problem in the OP libary or the way it was integrated. I believe
we will have more information on Thursday about this. Perhaps Ivan can say more about
this.
We have already given access to a number of people in the private repository, but we have
not seen any contributions yet. I would be happy to add you and/or other trusted people in
the private repository and also invite you in our Thursday call if you have the time to
help in realising a stable version that we can open source.
Christos
On 24 Oct 2022, at 14:34, Roland Hedberg wrote:
Sorry for the confusion! I meant satosa-pyoidc not
satosa-oidcop.
24 okt. 2022 kl. 10:23 skrev Roland Hedberg
<roland(a)catalogix.se>:
Hi!
This situation with EduTEAMs not releasing their satosa-idpy-oidc integration is really
hurting IdPy.
I think we should give up on EduTEAMs and instead bring in Giuseppe’s implementation.
As long as we keep satosa-oidcop on line as the ‘official’ IdPy SATOSA-OIDC package we
loose a lot of
help in making our own OIDC implementation better.
— Roland
_______________________________________________
Idpy-board mailing list -- idpy-board(a)lists.sunet.se
To unsubscribe send an email to idpy-board-leave(a)lists.sunet.se