Hi Thea,

Thank you for sharing this information. Given the comments below (which are quite
poor to me, specially the last one) the question is whether it makes sense to present
this poster at EARLI. Honestly, I am in favor of withdrawing our contribution.

What do you and the rest of the team think about this?

Regards.
Marcelo

On 2023-02-20 07:39, Christothea.Herodotou [She/Her] via Extendt2_omt wrote:

Dear all,

 

Our submission was accepted as a poster (see comments at the end of this email).

@Chronis Kynigos would you be able to join the conference and present?

 

Best,

Thea

 

From: info@earli.org <info@earli.org>
Date: Monday, 20 February 2023 at 09:14
To: Christothea.Herodotou [She/Her] <christothea.herodotou@open.ac.uk>
Subject: Your EARLI 2023 review result

CAUTION: This mail comes from outside the University. Please consider this before opening attachments, clicking links, or acting on the content.

Please read this message carefully as it contains important information about EARLI 2023.

 

---

 

Dear Dr Herodotou,

 

Congratulations!

Your Single Paper "Extending Design Thinking with Digital Technologies" has been accepted for presentation at EARLI 2023 in Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece as Poster Presentation. 

 

More details about the review process can be found at http://earli.org/events/EARLI2023. The status of your proposal can be found in your user dashboard.

 

Best wishes,

 

EARLI 2023 Organising Committee

 

EARLI 2023

 

http://earli.org/events/EARLI2023

 

___

 

score: 50.00 / comment: This proposal should be presented as a poster. It's a nice and interesting project, yet, still in the starting phase. There are no results or conclusions that can be mentioned in this stage. Therefor, the advice is to present it as a poster.

score: 80.00 / comment: The paper proposes a DBR into the possible use of emerging technologies at schools. The design is well described and the expected contributions would benefit the field.

score: 50.00 / comment: The proposal is very difficult to understand. I suspect it is not written by colleagues comming from the education world, but rather from the technical/bussiness world. Since it talks about expected findings, it should be -if at all- presented as a poster, or perhaps a workshop

total score: 60.000000

 

For more detailed review results, please consult your user dashboard in your account.

 

 

Best wishes,

EARLI Office

Peterseliegang 1 box 1

3000 Leuven (BELGIUM)

info@earli.org

BE0806.313.092


_______________________________________________
Extendt2_omt mailing list -- extendt2_omt@lists.sunet.se
To unsubscribe send an email to extendt2_omt-leave@lists.sunet.se